Bridging the gap between feedstock growers and users: the study of a coppice poplar-based biorefinery.
Identifieur interne : 001026 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001025; suivant : 001027Bridging the gap between feedstock growers and users: the study of a coppice poplar-based biorefinery.
Auteurs : Chang Dou [États-Unis] ; Rick Gustafson [États-Unis] ; Renata Bura [États-Unis]Source :
- Biotechnology for biofuels [ 1754-6834 ] ; 2018.
Abstract
Background
In the biofuel industry, land productivity is important to feedstock growers and conversion process product yield is important to the biorefinery. The crop productivity, however, may not positively correlate with bioconversion yield. Therefore, it is important to evaluate sugar yield and biomass productivity. In this study, 2-year-old poplar trees harvested in the first coppice cycle, including one low-productivity hybrid and one high-productivity hybrid, were collected from two poplar tree farms. Through steam pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, the bioconversion yields of low- and high-productivity poplar hybrids were compared for both sites.
Results
The low-productivity hybrids had 9-19% higher sugar yields than the high-productivity hybrids, although they have the similar chemical composition. Economic calculations show the impact on the plantation and biorefinery of using the two feedstocks. Growing a high-productivity hybrid means the land owner would use 11-26% less land (which could be used for other crops) or collect $2.53-$3.46 MM/year extra revenue from the surplus feedstock. On the other side, the biorefinery would receive 5-10% additional revenue using the low-productivity hybrid.
Conclusion
We propose a business model based on the integration of the plantation and the biorefinery. In this model, different feedstocks are assessed using a metric of product tonnage per unit land per year. Use of this new economic metric bridges the gap between feedstock growers and users to maximize the overall production efficiency.
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1079-y
PubMed: 29588662
PubMed Central: PMC5863363
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bridging the gap between feedstock growers and users: the study of a coppice poplar-based biorefinery.</title><author><name sortKey="Dou, Chang" sort="Dou, Chang" uniqKey="Dou C" first="Chang" last="Dou">Chang Dou</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gustafson, Rick" sort="Gustafson, Rick" uniqKey="Gustafson R" first="Rick" last="Gustafson">Rick Gustafson</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bura, Renata" sort="Bura, Renata" uniqKey="Bura R" first="Renata" last="Bura">Renata Bura</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2018">2018</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:29588662</idno><idno type="pmid">29588662</idno><idno type="doi">10.1186/s13068-018-1079-y</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC5863363</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000F03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F03</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000F03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000F03</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000F03</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Bridging the gap between feedstock growers and users: the study of a coppice poplar-based biorefinery.</title><author><name sortKey="Dou, Chang" sort="Dou, Chang" uniqKey="Dou C" first="Chang" last="Dou">Chang Dou</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gustafson, Rick" sort="Gustafson, Rick" uniqKey="Gustafson R" first="Rick" last="Gustafson">Rick Gustafson</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bura, Renata" sort="Bura, Renata" uniqKey="Bura R" first="Renata" last="Bura">Renata Bura</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Biotechnology for biofuels</title><idno type="ISSN">1754-6834</idno><imprint><date when="2018" type="published">2018</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Background</b></p><p>In the biofuel industry, land productivity is important to feedstock growers and conversion process product yield is important to the biorefinery. The crop productivity, however, may not positively correlate with bioconversion yield. Therefore, it is important to evaluate sugar yield and biomass productivity. In this study, 2-year-old poplar trees harvested in the first coppice cycle, including one low-productivity hybrid and one high-productivity hybrid, were collected from two poplar tree farms. Through steam pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, the bioconversion yields of low- and high-productivity poplar hybrids were compared for both sites.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Results</b></p><p>The low-productivity hybrids had 9-19% higher sugar yields than the high-productivity hybrids, although they have the similar chemical composition. Economic calculations show the impact on the plantation and biorefinery of using the two feedstocks. Growing a high-productivity hybrid means the land owner would use 11-26% less land (which could be used for other crops) or collect $2.53-$3.46 MM/year extra revenue from the surplus feedstock. On the other side, the biorefinery would receive 5-10% additional revenue using the low-productivity hybrid.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>We propose a business model based on the integration of the plantation and the biorefinery. In this model, different feedstocks are assessed using a metric of product tonnage per unit land per year. Use of this new economic metric bridges the gap between feedstock growers and users to maximize the overall production efficiency.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">29588662</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>01</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1754-6834</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>11</Volume><PubDate><Year>2018</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Biotechnology for biofuels</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Biotechnol Biofuels</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Bridging the gap between feedstock growers and users: the study of a coppice poplar-based biorefinery.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>77</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/s13068-018-1079-y</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="Background" NlmCategory="UNASSIGNED">In the biofuel industry, land productivity is important to feedstock growers and conversion process product yield is important to the biorefinery. The crop productivity, however, may not positively correlate with bioconversion yield. Therefore, it is important to evaluate sugar yield and biomass productivity. In this study, 2-year-old poplar trees harvested in the first coppice cycle, including one low-productivity hybrid and one high-productivity hybrid, were collected from two poplar tree farms. Through steam pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, the bioconversion yields of low- and high-productivity poplar hybrids were compared for both sites.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="Results" NlmCategory="UNASSIGNED">The low-productivity hybrids had 9-19% higher sugar yields than the high-productivity hybrids, although they have the similar chemical composition. Economic calculations show the impact on the plantation and biorefinery of using the two feedstocks. Growing a high-productivity hybrid means the land owner would use 11-26% less land (which could be used for other crops) or collect $2.53-$3.46 MM/year extra revenue from the surplus feedstock. On the other side, the biorefinery would receive 5-10% additional revenue using the low-productivity hybrid.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="Conclusion" NlmCategory="UNASSIGNED">We propose a business model based on the integration of the plantation and the biorefinery. In this model, different feedstocks are assessed using a metric of product tonnage per unit land per year. Use of this new economic metric bridges the gap between feedstock growers and users to maximize the overall production efficiency.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dou</LastName><ForeName>Chang</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</Affiliation><Identifier Source="ISNI">0000000122986657</Identifier><Identifier Source="GRID">grid.34477.33</Identifier></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gustafson</LastName><ForeName>Rick</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</Affiliation><Identifier Source="ISNI">0000000122986657</Identifier><Identifier Source="GRID">grid.34477.33</Identifier></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bura</LastName><ForeName>Renata</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100 USA.</Affiliation><Identifier Source="ISNI">0000000122986657</Identifier><Identifier Source="GRID">grid.34477.33</Identifier></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2018</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>22</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Biotechnol Biofuels</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101316935</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1754-6834</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Biofuel system</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Biorefinery</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Economic analysis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Feedstock plantation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Integrated model</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Poplar</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2018</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>22</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2018</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2018</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2018</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2018</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29588662</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/s13068-018-1079-y</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">1079</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5863363</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>ChemSusChem. 2017 Jan 10;10 (1):139-150</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27882723</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016 May 20;9:106</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27213013</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Jun 5;10 :144</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28592993</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 12;108(15):6300-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21444820</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Biotechnol J. 2014 Dec;12(9):1246-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25431201</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Apr;34(4):655-68</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21309794</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):845-50</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24379366</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):793-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20705852</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biotechnol Prog. 2009 Mar-Apr;25(2):333-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19294662</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2016 May;207 :157-65</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26881333</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioresour Technol. 2011 Feb;102(3):2651-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21109425</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Washington (État)</li></region></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Washington (État)"><name sortKey="Dou, Chang" sort="Dou, Chang" uniqKey="Dou C" first="Chang" last="Dou">Chang Dou</name></region><name sortKey="Bura, Renata" sort="Bura, Renata" uniqKey="Bura R" first="Renata" last="Bura">Renata Bura</name><name sortKey="Gustafson, Rick" sort="Gustafson, Rick" uniqKey="Gustafson R" first="Rick" last="Gustafson">Rick Gustafson</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001026 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001026 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:29588662
|texte= Bridging the gap between feedstock growers and users: the study of a coppice poplar-based biorefinery.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:29588662" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |